Liberty is an inherently offensive lifestyle. Living in a free society guarantees that each one of us will see our most cherished principles and beliefs questioned and in some cases mocked. That psychic discomfort is the price we pay for basic civic peace. It's worth it. It's a pragmatic principle. Defend everyone else's rights, because if you don't there is no one to defend yours. -- MaxedOutMama

I don't just want gun rights... I want individual liberty, a culture of self-reliance....I want the whole bloody thing. -- Kim du Toit

The most glaring example of the cognitive dissonance on the left is the concept that human beings are inherently good, yet at the same time cannot be trusted with any kind of weapon, unless the magic fairy dust of government authority gets sprinkled upon them.-- Moshe Ben-David

The cult of the left believes that it is engaged in a great apocalyptic battle with corporations and industrialists for the ownership of the unthinking masses. Its acolytes see themselves as the individuals who have been "liberated" to think for themselves. They make choices. You however are just a member of the unthinking masses. You are not really a person, but only respond to the agendas of your corporate overlords. If you eat too much, it's because corporations make you eat. If you kill, it's because corporations encourage you to buy guns. You are not an individual. You are a social problem. -- Sultan Knish

All politics in this country now is just dress rehearsal for civil war. -- Billy Beck

Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Quote of the Day - Health Care Edition

Quote of the Day - Health Care Edition

From segment 1 of Peter Robinson's NRO Uncommon Knowledge interview of Paul Rahe about his book Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect.
Robinson: Paul let me ask you a question. You said that President Obama's underlying intention is to cut health care costs. Do you believe that, or do - not so much with regard to President Obama personally as to the entire political impetus behind the health care legislation - or do you believe that there actually is a statist impulse in Washington that wishes to see the State expand for the sake of State expansion? Are they simply stumbling into this mistakenly? Or do they know what they're doing and want it?

Rahe: They know what they're doing and they want it.

Let me see if I can put it this way. We are all in the grips of the meddling impulse. If I were to say to you that you were a busybody you might say to me "surely not." And I would say to you "ask your children." And everyone's children would say that the parent is a busybody because we all feel that impulse. That is to say that we all feel that we know better than other people. (Sometimes we really do!) The more educated people become - when you give them Ph.D's, the more expertise they have - the more you have inflated their sense of the right to interfere in the lives of other people. So the Progressive impulse goes back to the 1870's and the 1880's and the establishment of major research universities on the German model in the United States.

The function of these institutions is to produce people who can successfully meddle in other people's lives.

Robinson: And in Barack Obama we have . . .

Rahe: The representative of that class. The perfect representative of that class.
This is a fascinating interview.

Another excerpt:
Rahe: (Montesquieu) comes up with a political typology into republics, monarchies and despotisms, and monarchies are governments where you have a king, but his power is limited in one fashion or another - usually by a nobility. Despotism is unlimited power, and these operate on the basis of psychological principles. What drives a despotism is terror. What drives a monarchy is the sense of honor, the love of honor that elicits a certain kind of behavior from people. What's required in a republic is virtue. That's hard to achieve, because you have to train people in virtue and it doesn't come naturally or easy to us to prefer the public interest over the private interest.
No indeed. And when the system stops teaching honor and virtue? When it, in fact, denigrates them both?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.