Liberty is an inherently offensive lifestyle. Living in a free society guarantees that each one of us will see our most cherished principles and beliefs questioned and in some cases mocked. That psychic discomfort is the price we pay for basic civic peace. It's worth it. It's a pragmatic principle. Defend everyone else's rights, because if you don't there is no one to defend yours. -- MaxedOutMama

I don't just want gun rights... I want individual liberty, a culture of self-reliance....I want the whole bloody thing. -- Kim du Toit

The most glaring example of the cognitive dissonance on the left is the concept that human beings are inherently good, yet at the same time cannot be trusted with any kind of weapon, unless the magic fairy dust of government authority gets sprinkled upon them.-- Moshe Ben-David

The cult of the left believes that it is engaged in a great apocalyptic battle with corporations and industrialists for the ownership of the unthinking masses. Its acolytes see themselves as the individuals who have been "liberated" to think for themselves. They make choices. You however are just a member of the unthinking masses. You are not really a person, but only respond to the agendas of your corporate overlords. If you eat too much, it's because corporations make you eat. If you kill, it's because corporations encourage you to buy guns. You are not an individual. You are a social problem. -- Sultan Knish

All politics in this country now is just dress rehearsal for civil war. -- Billy Beck

Sunday, September 05, 2004

More on "How Deep the Divide"

This is, in a way, a reciprocal link, but the piece expands greatly on what I had to say, and it's more than a merely worthwhile read. Ironbear of Who Tends the Fires has written an essay entitled "So, is it a Spade, or is it an 'Earth Removal Device'?" Excerpt:
Michele has stated several times that she has bad feelings about this coming November - 1968 all over again, like some bad acid deja vu. I think she's wrong only on her possible timing. I see that recently she's come to the same conclusions I did long ago, also: "This far, no farther. It ends here."

Porretto I believe sees the same light at the end of that tunnel, and he dances at the edges of it, never quite spelling it out. There's only one real conclusion to a political divide this deep, this wide, and this sharp. Only one way for it to go...

Civil War.

--

I have read a great deal of history. And I have read a great deal of past political debate and discourse. Like Beck, the last time I recall that we were this irrevocably divided between major factions was in the 1850's and 1860's - and we actually went to war within ourselves over it.

The divide is once again that stark, and that bleak. It's not "1968 all over again", it's 1858.

Unlike the first one, the dividing lines don't cut across states. Like the first one, the dividing lines are drawn across views of the ownership of men.... of wether (sic) we are owned by ourselves or by The State.
Read the whole thing. And think, really hard, about what he's saying.

Because I don't like it, but I don't think he's wrong.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.