The Smallest Minority

The Smallest Minority

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. - Ayn Rand

Liberty is an inherently offensive lifestyle. Living in a free society guarantees that each one of us will see our most cherished principles and beliefs questioned and in some cases mocked. That psychic discomfort is the price we pay for basic civic peace. It's worth it. It's a pragmatic principle. Defend everyone else's rights, because if you don't there is no one to defend yours. - MaxedOutMama

I don't just want gun rights... I want individual liberty, a culture of self-reliance....I want the whole bloody thing. Kim du Toit


I am Simon Jester
. . . and so are you






Wahabism Delenda Est











Hey, FEC!

BITE ME!
I'm a Member of
the McCain-Feingold
INSURRECTION!

Unorganized Militia Propaganda Corps




"Jeez, Kevin... calling you an asshole would be a huge understatement, wouldn't it?"
-Jack Cluth, The People's Republic of Seabrook
(Coming from you, Jack, it's an honor.)



email:
gunrightsAT
comcastDOTnet


INVITATION: If you have never shot a firearm, regardless of
your position on the right to arms,
and if you live near or visit the
Tucson, AZ
metropolitan area, I invite you
to go shooting for a day.

I will provide the arms, ammunition, targets,
safety equipment, range fees and instruction.

All you have to do is show up.

6 Takers To Date

DO YOU LIVE SOMEWHERE ELSE and want to try shooting?
Click HERE




Proud Gun-blogging member of the Pajamahadeen since May, 2003!

An Invitation to My Readers

Debates:

"The Commentary"
A OLD discussion on gun control between me and an Irishman living in London
Start here.
UPDATED! Now with archive!

Post #1 by Alex, a Guest
A multi-post discussion hosted here at TSM

My short exchange with
Professor Saul Cornell
of the Second Amendment Research Center

Best Posts:

The "Rights" Discussion:

What is a "Right?"

What is a "Right"? Revisited, Part I

Part II

Rights, Morality, Idealism & Pragmatism, Part I

Part II

Part III

Part IV

The United Federation of Planets

Is the Government Responsible for Your Protection?
Part I & Part II

1975 in Washington, D.C. vs. 2004 in Canton, Ohio

Go Ahead, Rely on the Government for Your Protection

The Other Side

Liberal vs. Conservative: Both are Necessary

The Mystery of Government

The Blog
that Ate Poughkeepsie


Updated and restated as:

Of Laws and Sausages

Militias

A Mistake a Free People Get to Make Only Once

The George Orwell Daycare Center

This is NOT What I Wanted to Read

TRUST

The Lying "News" Media, Pt. II

Say WHAT?

Bias? What Bias?

Agenda? What Agenda?

The Church of the MSM and the New Reformation

Let's See if I Can "Germinate an Intelligent Thought" Here

The ACLU Hasn't Changed its Tune

They Never EVER Stop

It is Not the Business of Government

Five Reasons Why It ISN'T

They Keep Making Better Fools

Five Month Investigation, 10 Tracer Rounds, Two Felony Convictions

That Sumbitch Ain't been BORN!

On Guillotines and Gibbets

England Slides Further Towards Bondage

Pressing the "RESET" Button

Freedom's Just Another Word for Nothin' Left To Lose

A Terrible Resolve

The Courts Will Not Save Us Trilogy:

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

"Game Over, Man. Game Over."

An Important Question

And the denouement:

Hudson Was Wrong

The Dangerous Victims Trilogy:

"(I)t's most important that all potential victims be as dangerous as they can"

Violence and the Social Contract

Governments, Criminals, and Dangerous Victims

In the same vein:

Those Without Swords Can Still Die Upon Them

The True Believers Trilogy:

True Believers

March of the Lemmings
Reasonable People

Also in the same vein:

Tough History Coming

The Culture Trilogy

Culture

Hubris

Weltanschauung

And its follow-on:

In Re: Culture

Technical Dissertations

Why Ballistic Fingerprinting Doesn't (And Won't) Work

Spin, Spin, Spin

Speaking of Teddy Kennedy...

This is the Kind of Thing That REALLY IRRITATES ME

Questions from the Audience?

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Wednesday, May 18, 2005
 
You'll Notice that Corporal Punishment isn't One of the Considered Options.

Reader Aaron sent me a link to an MSNBC story on Britain's "Yob Culture" and the (pathetic) efforts to rein it in.

Sweet bleeding jeebus.
Targeting badly behaved Britons

By Jennifer Carlile
Reporter
MSNBC
Updated: 2:29 p.m. ET May 18, 2005


BLUEWATER SHOPPING CENTER, England - Although accustomed for decades to violence from "yobs" and football hooligans, Britain is stepping up its fight against what's been dubbed an epidemic of antisocial behavior.
There it is again, "antisocial behavior." That's British for "violent crime." This is one of those things I both admire and despise the Left for. Controlling the language allows one to control the debate. I'm not certain if it's a case of "magial thinking" in that, by altering the words they believe they can alter reality, or if it's only a cold-blooded understanding that changing the definition will allow them to invalidate the arguments of the opposition without actually having to refute them, or if it's some combination of both. I suspect the latter. Look how well they do it. It's almost unconscious now. The Right does it, too, but the Left has mastered the art form.
The perpetrators of the thuggery have been identified as "hoodies," young people who wear hoods and caps to avoid detection and give off a threatening image.

Prime Minister Tony Blair has made banishment of this street crime a priority for his third term of office, while one of his closest aides has disclosed a scary encounter with the teenage gangs that roam Britain's urban areas.

Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott, who once launched a fierce left hook to retaliate for a thrown egg during an election campaign, described his alarm at being accosted by a large group of hooded youths.

“I went to a motorway café about a year ago and some kid said something to me,” he said. “I said ‘what did you say?’ and he came back with 10 people with hoods, you know, these fellas with hoods on.

“He came at me in a very intimidating manner,” the 66-year-old said.
Yes, I imagine they did. Prescott being an elderly man faced with ten youths should have found it intimidating. I'm 43 and I'd find 10-to-one odds intimidating, especially if I were unarmed. But wait!
Prescott, who was rescued from any possible attack by his security detail, is one of the big supporters of Blair's decision to focus on street crime.
Rescued "from any possible attack" by his security detail! How nice! Too bad Thomas Noble didn't have a security detail. Neither did Mi Gao Huang Chen. No, Mr. Chen had to depend on the police, who failed him for fifteen minutes, even though he was attacked, oh, sorry, experienced "antisocial behavior" from possibly twenty "yobbos" in a "high-profile" police zone. Well, at least two of Mr. Chen's attackers antisocial behaviorists have been charged with murder. The hoodlums youths suspected in Mr. Noble's death have been "slapped with Asbos". WTF are Asbos, you ask? Well MSNBC is here to tell you! Just hold on through the rest of this:
Although gun crime here pales when compared with the United States, binge-drinking, street brawls, vandalism, muggings, and general menace are seen to be terrorizing the public.

The United Kingdom is the most-monitored nation in the world, with more than 4 million closed-circuit television cameras operating around the country. But culprits frequently evade Big Brother’s watchful eye by concealing their identities with the ubiquitous head wear.

"I think the fact you go around with these hats and these covers... I mean, it is a uniform, in a sense," Prescott said last week.

As a result, a large shopping center in southeast England offered a new tact by implementing a "code of conduct" that includes a ban on the wearing of "hoodies."

The 330-store Bluewater center in Kent drew up the code of conduct to outline its “zero tolerance approach to antisocial behavior” following consultations with guests and staff.

In addition to banning head coverings (other than those used for religious purposes) and swearing, “groups of more than five without the intention to shop will be asked to leave the center,” the mall’s leaflet says.

Blair last week praised the initiative. “This type of disrespect and yobbish behavior will not be tolerated any more,” he said.
No, it won't be tolerated. And if they continue to do it, the Brits will emulate the UN and issue another sternly worded warning!
“I think it's marvelous,” Bluewater shopper Jill Hopper said of the initiative this week.

“It’s such a pleasant atmosphere here; you don’t want a whole group of hoodies coming around — it's great they’re taking these kids on,” the 46-year-old said.

“They do intimidate some people and that's their aim,” said 27-year-old shopper Adam Cropper.

His girlfriend Laura Thomas, 23, added, “They're all quite young and trying to act older … they wear (hoods) to make people think they’re stealing even if they don’t have the balls to do it, it’s all part of their act."
Until, of course, they do work up the balls to do it. Or until they try to intimidate someone, and failing, become violent. I mean, wait until one of them gets a knife and a nice young Briton like Laura Thomas asks "What are you going to do, stab us?"
Cropper, a doorman, and Thomas, a bar manager, both added that they would like to see a complete ban on caps and hoods in city centers.
That should go remarkably well with the semi-automatic weapon ban, the handgun ban, the knife ban, the "offensive weapon" ban, the... Well, you get the picture. How about we just ban clothes? Won't that work? But no, they have better ideas!
Bluewater’s code of conduct follows in the footsteps of other government and private initiatives to quash hooliganism that include:

* Handing out antisocial behavior orders (ASBOS), some of which bar offending youths from entering city centers or visiting former partners in crime.
* Passing out yellow and red cards in a warning system similar to that used on the soccer field.
* Giving away chocolate to prevent alcohol-fueled violence.
* Banning the designer label Burberry (an apparent favorite with teen gangs) from some bars and clubs.
ASBOS: Antisocial behavior orders. This would be similar to our restraining orders. Go peruse Zendo Deb's site, TFS Magnum for some stories on just how effective restraining orders are here. Remember, some of the goblins mislead youths suspected of being involved in Thomas Noble's death received the dreaded ASBOS!! I'm sure they're suitably chastened.

The other options? Yellow and red warning cards? Want to bet on how many of them end up stuck in public toilets, used with a little scatalogical imagination? Chocolate give-aways to "prevent alcohol-fueled violence"? I thought I'd never heard anything stupider than "midnight basketball" in association with youth violence prevention. Banning Burberry? So they switch to Tommy Hilfiger?

How do human beings disconnect from reality this way? I can't finish the MSNBC piece, I'm too disgusted. All of this reminds me sickeningly of Theodore Dalrymple's The Frivolity of Evil though. Read that if you have the stomach for it.

Labels: ,


|




Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I use such material in an effort to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is used without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.